Skip to content
English
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

Why Your Test Emails Go Missing

Getting marketing emails to the customer's inbox is the ultimate goal, but sometimes, the first hurdle is simply getting a test email to your own team. 

A common issue in email deliverability involves the dreaded bounce suppression list, which can silently sabotage your testing process.

In email systems, a bounce suppression list is a vital guardrail designed to protect your sender reputation. When an email to a specific address fails permanently (a "hard bounce"), that address is added to the list, preventing future sends and saving you from being flagged as a spammer.

However, issues arise when internal test addresses, like those used by marketing or IT teams, are accidentally flagged as hard bounces. This is what happened in a recent case involving a client's testing efforts: internal addresses were being blocked because the system interpreted the failed test sends as permanent failures.

The Technical Glitch: "Unable to Parse Reason"

When a test send fails, the marketing platform relies on the recipient's mail server to send back a clear reason (e.g., "mailbox full," "address unknown"). In the problematic case, the bounce report was unclear, showing an error like, "unable to parse reason from bounce report."

This technical ambiguity points to a likely culprit: security measures on the recipient's end. It suggests that the bounce is not a simple issue of a bad mailbox, but rather that the recipient's corporate email server, firewall, or security filter is actively rejecting the incoming test email before the marketing platform can understand the exact reason.

Addressing the Issue: The Two-Pronged Solution

Resolving this requires both immediate action and a long-term strategy:

1. The Short-Term Fix: Manual Intervention

The immediate step is often to manually remove the affected test addresses from the bounce suppression list. While this gets the current tests moving again, it is only a temporary patch. If the root cause (the server rejection) isn't addressed, the addresses will simply be added back to the list the next time a test fails.

2. The Long-Term Strategy: IT Partnership

Resolving this requires both immediate action and a proactive, long-term strategy involving internal collaboration.

  • Engineering a Bypass Filter (Active Investigation)

Our engineering team is currently working on a critical solution: implementing a special filter to treat designated "test sends" differently. This bypass filter would allow test emails to deliver regardless of whether the recipient address is on the suppression list. This separates critical testing from general list hygiene, ensuring continuity while we address the underlying rejection issue. We will provide an update once the feasibility of this implementation is confirmed.

  • Root Cause Analysis: IT Partnership

More critically, the sustainable solution requires cooperation between the marketing team and the internal IT department. We strongly recommend collaborating with your IT team to investigate their mail server and firewall logs. Why are these specific test emails being rejected, and what can be done to whitelist or modify the security settings to allow them through? Addressing the root cause is the only way to ensure the addresses are not added back to the suppression list in the future.